Acute Inflammation with a Focus on Sepsis

From SensUs Wiki
Revision as of 14:58, 4 December 2024 by Techsensus (talk | contribs) (Created page with "thumb|360px|Crystal structure of IL-6. <ref name="Arti1">Crystal structure of IL-6 as published in the Protein Data Bank rendered in Pymol (PDB: 1ALU), 2006, Ramin Herati</ref> == General information == The theme of SensUs 2022 is acute inflammation in intensive care with a focus on sepsis. According to the World Health Organization, sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:IL6 Crystal Structure.rsh.png
Crystal structure of IL-6. [1]

General information

The theme of SensUs 2022 is acute inflammation in intensive care with a focus on sepsis. According to the World Health Organization, sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. It causes 11 million deaths each year and affects an estimated 49 million people worldwide.[2] According to experts, the diagnosis of sepsis is often set too late as the symptoms arise when organ injury has already occurred, hence the millions of deaths. Sepsis is one of several acute inflammatory responses; others can be caused by injurious agents such as allergens, toxins, burns, and frostbite.[3] Clinically, acute inflammation is characterized by five cardinal signs: redness, increased heat, swelling, pain, and functio laesa (i.e. loss of function). It may be regarded as the first line of defense against injury, releasing signaling molecules such as cytokines and chemokines to assist in healing the body and returning to homeostasis. [4]

Interleukin (IL)-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine with a wide range of biological activities. It induces pro- and anti-inflammatory reactions and is rapidly induced in the course of acute inflammatory reactions. IL-6 is produced by lymphoid and nonlymphoid cells and helps regulate immune reactivity, the acute phase response, inflammation, oncogenesis, and hematopoiesis. Studies have shown that IL-6 appears to be both a marker and mediator of sepsis and persists in the plasma much longer than other proinflammatory cytokines.[5] Therefore IL-6 serves as a valuable biomarker for the early detection of sepsis.

History of Sepsis

The oldest report that associates sepsis with wounds goes all the way back to a discovery by Edwin Smith. In 1826 he found a papyrus in Luxor, Egypt, which was written around 1600 BC. This papyrus seemed to be a copy of an even older manuscript written around 3000 BC. In this manuscript, 48 cases of traumatic lesions between wounds, fractures, and dislocations are mentioned. Clear references to fever as a secondary phenomenon in the wound – with emphasis on the fever as a part of the monitoring of the patients’ evolution - are found in five out of the forty-eight references. Thus, without being familiar with the concept of infection or inflammation, these Egyptian physicians were able to identify some clear signs of what we know nowadays as local suppuration and systemic infection.[6][7][8]

The first reported use of the word sepsis (σηψις) is in a poem of Homer in the Iliad, where it is a derivative of the word sepo (σηπω), which translates to “I rot”. Yet, the first use of sepsis in a medical context can be found in the Hippocratic corpus, written around 400 BC. The use of this word was related to the phenomenon discovered by the Egyptians. Hippocrates described sepsis as a dangerous odiferous biological decay that could occur in the body. Furthermore, it was believed that this decay took place in the colon and from there “dangerous principles” were released, which could cause “auto-intoxication”. Hippocrates was the first one to try and find antisepsis properties and potential medicinal compounds.[6][9][8]

In the nineteenth century, large growth in the knowledge on the origin and transmission of infectious diseases occurred. One of the physicians who contributed significantly to this development was Ignaz Semmelweiss (1818-1865). He was a physician in Vienna, Austria. In 1841, while working on a maternity ward in a hospital he noticed that there was a high rate of death from childbed fever. Nowadays this is also known as puerperal sepsis. He made the observation that women whose deliveries were assisted by midwives had a significantly lower percentage of infection (2%) than deliveries assisted by medical students (16%). Back then, the medical students practiced both autopsies and childbirth deliveries on the same day without washing their hands. When one of Semmelweis’ colleagues died of an infection, Semmelweis made the connection between the medical students, the deliveries, the autopsies, and puerperal sepsis. Semmelweis’ comment on this situation was “The fingers and hands of students and doctors, soiled by recent dissections, carry those death-dealing cadaver’s poisons into the genital organs of women in childbirth”. When a handwashing policy was implemented, the rates of puerperal sepsis dropped to under 3%.[9][7][8]

In 1964 Dr. Edward Frank from Boston published a management strategy for septic shock. This strategy consisted of continuous monitoring of systemic arterial pressure, central venous pressure, cardiac output, urinary output, blood volume, blood chemistries, gases, pH and electrolytes. Some of these are still used nowadays, such as blood monitoring and urinary output. Aided by the discovery of antibiotics by Alexander Fleming, it was also recommended to find the cause of the infection.[10]

Mechanism of Acute Inflammation

When the human body is subjected to harmful stimuli, an inflammatory response is activated to remove these stimuli and, if necessary, initiate a healing process. Cellular and molecular events take place to minimize injury and infection. Common characteristics of inflammation on tissue level are redness, heat, pain and loss of tissue function, which all result from local immune, vascular and inflammatory cell responses to infection or injury.[11] The mentioned events are a consequence of specific complex molecular pathways involving different types of receptors, transcription factors, leukocytes and eventually cytokines that induce inflammatory responses. Even though different stimuli may evoke different inflammation pathways in the human body, in general, a common mechanism is applied which can be summarized in four steps as stated in research done by Chen et al., 2018 [11]:

1. Cell surface pattern receptors recognize harmful stimuli

2. Inflammatory pathways are activated

3. Inflammatory markers are released

4. Inflammatory cells are recruited

Pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) trigger inflammatory responses through activation of specific pattern recognition receptors. As a result, the production of proinflammatory cytokines is induced. Proinflammatory cytokines are produced predominantly by activated macrophages and are involved in the upregulation of inflammatory reactions.[12] Interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) are cytokines that mediate receptor activation in order to trigger crucial intracellular signaling pathways that may start the healing process.

However, in the case of acute inflammation, the response to an infection is dysregulated and often disproportional to the severity of the infection. The response gets overheated, overactivated, and can damage the body from within. Potential consequences of this overly strong reaction include infections, organ dysfunction (severe sepsis), or septic shock which is a state of circulatory failure where circulatory, cellular and metabolic abnormalities are associated with an increased risk of death. These reactions are often caused by coagulation (i.e. formation of blood clots) dysregulation. The hypercoagulability of sepsis is thought to be driven by the release of tissue factor from disrupted endothelial cells.[13] When the human body suffers from severe sepsis, activated monocytes and endothelial cells, along with circulating microvesicles, become sources of tissue factor[14].

This factor then causes the systemic activation of the coagulation cascade resulting in the production of thrombin, activation of platelets, and formation of platelet–fibrin clots. These structures can result in local perfusion defects leading to tissue hypoxia and organ dysfunction [13]. Moreover, research has shown that dysregulated apoptotic immune cell-death plays a crucial part in immune dysfunction and mortality of sepsis. Apoptosis is a “programmed cell death” to limit damage of surrounding tissue during the immune response[15]. It is a vital component of many processes in the human body such as cell turnover, proper development and functioning of the immune system [15] Most cells that undergo enhanced apoptosis in sepsis are of lymphoid origin, hence less immune cells are left to fight off the infection itself [16]. Since no effective treatment for sepsis exists yet, early diagnosis and recognition is crucial.[17]

This is where IL-6 plays an important part. As mentioned, IL-6 is a cytokine that functions as a crucial mediator during the acute phase of response to inflammation in sepsis.[18] Research on the clinical value of IL-6 in patients with sepsis and septic shock describes that IL-6 is considered controversial regarding its diagnostic and prognostic values, where meta-analysis of diagnostic value of IL-6 has shown that IL-6 only offers moderate success in differentiating sepsis from non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).[19] Hence it is recommended that IL-6 is used as a biomarker to confirm infection rather than differentiate between sepsis and SIRS[19].

Medical Application & Relevance

As mentioned, sepsis causes each year more than 11 million deaths while affecting approximately 50 million people worldwide.[2] Mortality rates from sepsis, according to data from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2012, were approximately 41% in Europe versus approximately 28.3% in the United States.[20] Severe sepsis causes dysfunction of multiple organs with as a consequence a state of chronic critical illness involving severe immune dysfunction and catabolism.[21] Despite efforts of experimental and clinical research during the last thirty years, the ability to positively influence the course and outcome of the disease continues to be inadequate. Options of successful and specific interventions are limited and often unsuccessful. If sepsis is detected early and has not affected vital organs yet, administration of different antibiotics have shown to increase chances of survival.[22][20]

Furthermore, early symptoms of sepsis are rather generic, e.g. fever, chills, feeling dizzy or nausea, and thus are not often attributed to sepsis in the early stages.[23] When sepsis goes undetected for too long, or if effective treatment is withheld, sepsis can rapidly progress to septic shock where risk of mortality increases by 7.6% each hour . Hence, a patient suffering from sepsis must be diagnosed correctly in time to prevent worsening of the disease with death as a potential consequence.[22]

Currently, sepsis is diagnosed with standard laboratory techniques, which takes 12-72 hours before results are obtained. These tests are based on blood cultures looking for bacterial or viral infections.[24] However, research shows that sepsis cannot always be attributed to only the infectious agent and the immune response that follows, but also to more complex and indirect factors such as significant alterations in coagulation, immunosuppression and organ dysfunction.[13] Hence, it is often difficult to diagnose sepsis in a patient on time since multiple causes might be at hand. Early diagnosis is therefore key to battle sepsis. With a biosensor that detects IL-6 in the early stages, symptoms can be classified as belonging to sepsis and consequently, the mortality and severity of sepsis can be decreased. Sepsis is treatable if it is identified and treated quickly which in most cases leads to full recovery with no lasting problems[23].

State of the Art

Currently, the concentration of unbound IL-6 is typically measured in serum, i.e. blood samples are clotted and refrigerated-centrifuged within 25-40 minutes after collection. The serum is then suited for use in several immunoassays, e.g., ELISA, CLIA, ECLIA, and RIA. Alternatively, the serum can be frozen and stored at -20 ℃ or lower for later use.[25][26] In addition, commercial assays also allow for measurement in plasma. Whole blood is collected into anticoagulant-treated tubes e.g., EDTA-treated or citrate-treated. Cells are removed from plasma by centrifugation for 10 minutes at 1000-2000 x g using a refrigerated centrifuge. Centrifugation for 15 minutes at 2000 x g depletes platelets in the plasma sample.

Company Product Test name Sample volume (μL) Sample matrix Range (pg/mL) Sensitivity (pg/mL) Precision (CV%) Incubation time (min) Measuring Technique Assay type
Beckman Coulter A16369 Access IL-6 Assay 110 Serum or plasma 0.5 - 1500 0.5 N/A 35 CLIA One-step immunoenzymatic sandwich assay
Roche COBAS 5109442190 Elecsys IL-6 30 Serum or plasma 1.5 - 5000 1.5 N/A 18 ECLIA Sandwich
ThermoFisher Scientific MAN0014630 Human IL-6 ELISA Kit 100 Serum, plasma, buffered solution, or cell culture supernatants 7.8 - 2500 < 2.0 Intra-assay: CV = 6.2%, Inter-assay CV = 7.9% 180 ELISA Solid-phase sandwich
R&D Systems Inc. D6050 Quantikine® Human IL-6 Immunoassay 100 Serum, plasma, or cell culture supernatants 3.1 - 300 0.7 Intra-assay: CV = 2.0% - 4.2%, Inter-assay: CV = 3.8% - 6.4% 270 ELISA Sandwich
abcam ab178013 Human IL-6 ELISA Kit N/A Serum, EDTA plasma, cit plasma, cell culture supernatants 7.8 - 500 1.6 Intra-assay CV = 2.1%, Inter-assay CV = 2.4% 90 ELISA Sandwich
RayBio ELH-IL6 RayBio® Human IL-6 ELISA Kit 100 Serum, plasma, cell culture supernatants 3.0 - 1000 3.0 Intra-assay CV =< 10%, Inter-assay CV =< 12% 150 ELISA Sandwich
Table 1: Commercially available IL-6 well-plate assays.


Immunoassays, in general, provide a relatively slow method for measuring specific biomarkers like IL-6. Therefore, faster methods are the subject of intensive research. A commercially available rapid test is the Milenia® QuickLine IL-6 test: Milenia Biotec.[27] This lateral flow immunoassay is designed for the semi-quantitative evaluation of human Interleukin-6 in serum, plasma, cell culture supernatant, amniotic fluid or cerebrospinal fluid.[28][29] In the Milenia® QuickLine IL-6 test, the sample is pipetted in the sample application port. IL-6 of the patient's sample binds to a first monoclonal anti-IL-6 antibody conjugated to gold particles. The IL-6-loaded gold particles diffuse through the membrane and overflow the test line (T). There, a second monoclonal antibody specific for IL-6 is coated on the membrane; so the gold particles are bound specifically and become visible as a colored line. The color intensity is proportional to the concentration of IL-6 in the sample and intensifies during the incubation time. The surplus of gold particles continues to diffuse over the test strip. The conjugate specific antibodies printed as a control line on the membrane (control line, C) capture the gold conjugate and therefore a visible line develops during the incubation time.[30][31]

Company Product Test name Sample volume (μL) Sample matrix Range (pg/mL) Sensitivity (pg/mL) Incubation time (min) Measuring Technique
Milenia Biotec MQL6 1 Milenia® QuickLine IL-6 test 100 Serum, plasma, cell culture supernatants, amniotic fluid, cerebrospinal fluid 50 - 10000 50 20 LFIA
Table 2: Commercially available rapid test, Milenia® Quickline IL-6 test.

Safety & Lab protocols

Safety

Interleukin-6 is present in blood plasma, thus the sample preparation in the lab will also take place with human blood plasma as matrix. It is of crucial importance to handle human blood plasma with care due to potential pathogens that can be transmitted, such as Hepatitis viruses and HIV.[32] Sigma Aldrich has screened the blood plasma in advance on HIV, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C, however caution is recommended all the same.[33] Specific lab protocols and rules will be listed below.


Lab protocols

During the preparation of the blood samples, one should avoid physical contact with blood by wearing gloves, glasses, and lab coats. Needles and lancets should be used only once and disposed of in a sharps container for decontamination.[34] Furthermore, cuts already present on hands or arms should be covered with plasters to avoid blood-on-blood contact. After completing the samples, gloves should be removed and hands should be washed thoroughly.[34] The waste should be disposed of in specific biohazard waste bins or bags.

Il-6 will be provided by HyTest. Instructions for storage will also be provided by HyTest. In general, human interleukin-6 is not a dangerous substance according to GHS ((Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals).[35] Potential health effects include:

  • harm if inhaled
  • respiratory tract irritation
  • harmful if absorbed through skin
  • skin irritation
  • eye irritation
  • harmful if swallowed[35]

References

  1. ↑ Crystal structure of IL-6 as published in the Protein Data Bank rendered in Pymol (PDB: 1ALU), 2006, Ramin Herati
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 WHO - Health topics - Sepsis, WHO, 2021, https://www.who.int/health-topics/sepsis#tab=tab_1
  3. ↑ Acute Inflammatory Response, StatPearls Publishing LLC, 2020, Hannoodee, Sally Nasuruddin, D. N.
  4. ↑ Concise Pathology (3rd ed.), Appleton & Lange, 1997, Chandrasoma, P., & Taylor, C. R.
  5. ↑ Interleukin-6. Critical Care Medicine, 33(12 Suppl), S463-5, 2005, Song, M., & Kellum, J. A. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000186784.62662.a1
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 The History of Sepsis from Ancient Egypt to the XIX Century, (M. C. F. P. E.-L. Azevedo (Ed.); p. Ch. 1). IntechOpen, 2012, Botero, J. S. H., https://doi.org/10.5772/51484
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 The last 100 years of sepsis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 173(3), 256–263, 2006, Vincent, J.-L., & Abraham, E., https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200510-1604OE
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Sepsis History, https://www.news-medical.net/health/Sepsis-History.aspx, 2018, Ryding, S.
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 Sepsis and septic shock: a history. Critical Care Clinics, 25(1), 83–101, viii, 2009, Funk, D. J., Parrillo, J. E., & Kumar, A., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2008.12.003
  10. ↑ The History of Sepsis Management Over the Last 30 Years. Elsevier, 15(2), 116–117, 2014, Zehava L., N., https://daneshyari.com/article/preview/3235901.pdf
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Inflammatory responses and inflammation-associated diseases in organs, Oncotarget, 9(6), 7204–7218, 2018, Chen, L., Deng, H., Cui, H., Fang, J., Zuo, Z., Deng, J., Li, Y., Wang, X., & Zhao, L., https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23208
  12. ↑ Cytokines, inflammation, and pain. International Anesthesiology Clinics, 45(2), 27–37, 2007, Zhang, J.-M., & An, J., https://doi.org/10.1097/AIA.0b013e318034194e
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 Sepsis: The evolution in definition, pathophysiology, and management. SAGE Open Medicine, 7, 2050312119835043–2050312119835043, 2019, Gyawali, B., Ramakrishna, K., & Dhamoon, A. S., https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312119835043
  14. ↑ Role of extracellular vesicles in the development of sepsis-induced coagulopathy. Journal of Intensive Care, 6, 68, 2018, Iba, T., & Ogura, H., https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0340-6
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicologic Pathology, 35(4), 495–516, 2007, Elmore, S., https://doi.org/10.1080/01926230701320337
  16. ↑ Host–pathogen interactions in sepsis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 8(1), 32–43, 2008, van der Poll, T., & Opal, S. M., https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70265-7
  17. ↑ Sepsis and septic shock: current approaches to management. Internal Medicine Journal, 49(2), 160–170., 2019, Thompson, K., Venkatesh, B., & Finfer, S., https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.14199
  18. ↑ Diagnostic and prognostic value of interleukin-6, pentraxin 3, and procalcitonin levels among sepsis and septic shock patients: a prospective controlled study according to the Sepsis-3 definitions. BMC Infectious Diseases, 19(1), 968, 2019, Song, J., Park, D. W., Moon, S., Cho, H.-J., Park, J. H., Seok, H., & Choi, W. S., https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4618-7
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 Role of interleukin-6 to differentiate sepsis from non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Cytokine, 88, 126–135, 2016, Ma, L., Zhang, H., Yin, Y.-L., Guo, W.-Z., Ma, Y.-Q., Wang, Y.-B., Shu, C., & Dong, L.-Q., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2016.08.033
  20. ↑ 20.0 20.1 Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study. Critical Care Medicine, 43(1), 3–12, 2015, Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Phillips, G. S., Townsend, S. R., Schorr, C. A., Beale, R., Osborn, T., Lemeshow, S., Chiche, J.-D., Artigas, A., & Dellinger, R. P., https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000723
  21. ↑ Sepsis: pathophysiology and clinical management. BMJ, 353, i1585, 2016, Gotts, J. E., & Matthay, M. A., https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1585
  22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 Sepsis—Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Concepts. Frontiers in Medicine, 8, 609, 2021, Jarczak, D., Kluge, S., & Nierhaus, A., https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.628302
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 NHS inform Scotland - Sepsis, https://www.nhsinform.scot/illnesses-and-conditions/blood-and-lymph/sepsis, 2020
  24. ↑ How is sepsis diagnosed and treated?, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Retrieved September 28, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/sepsis/diagnosis/
  25. ↑ Plasma and Serum Preparation, ThermoFisher Scientific, 2007, https://www.thermofisher.com/nl/en/home/references/protocols/cell-and-tissue-analysis/elisa-protocol/elisa-sample-preparation-protocols/plasma-and-serum-preparation.html
  26. ↑ Measuring cytokine levels in blood. Importance of anticoagulants, processing, and storage conditions. Journal of Immunological Methods, 153(1–2), 115–124, 1992, Thavasu, P. W., Longhurst, S., Joel, S. P., Slevin, M. L., & Balkwill, F. R., https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(92)90313-i
  27. ↑ Milenia Biotec, 2016, https://www.milenia-biotec.com/en/product/il6/#nav-overview
  28. ↑ Rapid and sensitive detection of interleukin-6 in serum via time-resolved lateral flow immunoassay, Analytical Biochemistry, 588, 113468, 2020, Huang, D., Ying, H., Jiang, D., Liu, F., Tian, Y., Du, C., Zhang, L., & Pu, X., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2019.113468
  29. ↑ Development of quantum dot-based fluorescence lateral flow immunoassay strip for rapid and quantitative detection of serum interleukin-6, Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 35(5), e23752, 2021, Tang, J., Wu, L., Lin, J., Zhang, E., & Luo, Y., https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23752
  30. ↑ A Point of Care Lateral Flow Assay for Rapid and Colorimetric Detection of Interleukin 6 and Perspectives in Bedside Diagnostics, J Clin Med Res, 2(2), 1–16, 2020, de Souza Sene, I., Costa, V., Bras, D. C., de Oliveira Farias, E. A., Nunes, G. E., & Bechtold, I. H., https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37191/Mapsci-2582-4333-2(2)-032
  31. ↑ Duplex Shiny app quantification of the sepsis biomarkers C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 in a fast quantum dot labeled lateral flow assay, Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 18(1), 130, 2020, Ruppert, C., Kaiser, L., Jacob, L. J., Laufer, S., Kohl, M., & Deigner, H.-P., https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-020-00688-1
  32. ↑ Recommendations for the production, control and regulation of human plasma for fractionation, World Health Organization, 2007, https://www.who.int/bloodproducts/publications/TRS941Annex4blood.pdf
  33. ↑ Plasma from human, Sigma Aldrich, Retrieved November 12, 2021 from https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/NL/en/product/sigma/p9523, n.d.
  34. ↑ 34.0 34.1 Serum / Plasma Specimens - Safety, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016, https://www.cdc.gov/dpdx/diagnosticprocedures/serum/safety.html
  35. ↑ 35.0 35.1 Safety Data Sheet - Recombinant Human Interleukin-6 (IL-6), BioVision Inc., 2015, https://www.biovision.com/documentation/sds/4143_SDS.pdf
Retrieved from "https://wiki.sensus.org/index.php?title=Acute_Inflammation_with_a_Focus_on_Sepsis&oldid=9"